In the current government shutdown, and the campaign to defund Obamacare, it certainly sounds that way to me.
I’m angry. I don’t usually talk this way. But for better or worse, for the moment, I will.
I don’t know the numbers, and I’d welcome if someone would tell me. I also don’t understand how the numbers work here, and I’d also welcome if someone would tell me.
How is it that the Tea Party has not just hamstrung the Republican Party, but also the House as a whole?
Let’s say the President proposed that “tomorrow” be defined as “the day after today.” Let’s also suppose there are 100 Tea Partiers in the House; of 235 Republicans; and that the remaining 200 House members are, you know, Them.
Obviously, the 100 Tea Partiers will oppose the President here, just as they do as to anything else. But how can the remaining 135 Republicans, along with the 200 Them, fail to pass such a thing?
Call it kairotic, call it synchronicity, call it whatever. I am working on the “substantial response” mentioned here, specifically just now on a passage about how the emotionally needy, the infantile, those who stomp their feet and throw tantrums like two-year olds, lack the wherewithal to learn problem-solving skills, being intransigent and unwilling and unable to compromise or negotiate. I’m speaking there of what may be called the “underclass,” but the equal pertinence to the Tea Party leaves me speechless.
The significance of this discovery is not to be underestimated.
I would have supposed it occurred much earlier. To put things in context, 1973 is the year I graduated high school. So maybe that’s about right.
This opened the door to study of the whole world of receptors, with many important developments. Discovery of the serotonin receptors was key to invention of the medicines now most widely prescribed, and most successful, for treatment of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Discovery of the insulin receptors has wholly changed research into diabetes.
At least from its Amazon page, Everything You Need to Know to Feel Go(o)d seems to deserve attention.
One may need to take the term “intelligence” here with a large grain of salt.
At any rate, the reader has provided me with the actual text of the op-ed piece.
There is more to this than other commentators have indicated. I will have my own response here within a few days.
A reader just brought to my attention a recent “controversial article” by Andy Kessler that appeared in the July 8, 2013 Wall Street Journal, suggesting that I might respond to it here.
We’ll see. Thus there may be a “Round 2.”
One response to Kessler’s editorial: “Andy Kessler, Former Hedge Fund Manager, Says Shelter Volunteers Cause Homelessness”
The big obstacle is that the original is available online only to WSJ subscribers.
Quoting from my e-mail reply to the reader:
If you’re not familiar with the October 17, 2012 post, I commend it to your attention now.
I had not known about the defamation case.
The search continues for an environmental scapegoat, for what to me appears to be a strictly genetic disease.
Links within this post, to the headlines:
Home-schooled = Un-schooled?
Baltimore City Schools’ BELL program
Exclusive: 4 in 5 in US face near-poverty, no work
Sexting: How typical is Anthony Weiner’s behavior?
2 ‘Real Housewives of NJ’ stars charged with fraud
“By the time he was 16, [Josh Powell] had never written an essay. He didn’t know South Africa was a country. He couldn’t solve basic algebra problems.”
He took three years of remedial courses at a community college before obtaining admission to Georgetown at age 21.
“Most of all, he worries about his siblings: There are 11. One, old enough to be well into middle school, can’t read, Josh Powell said.”
This is at the diametric pole from the just-previous item. See also the previous post, D.C. to implement 9th-grade rescue plan.
I don’t need to comment on that.
This quote struck me:
” ‘ In the case of Anthony Weiner, and other partnered people who sext with non-partners, it strikes me as a kind of pornography, where the drive is toward excited, impersonal sex rather than true intimacy.
” ‘ With Weiner, it’s a case of pornography meets narcissism. ‘ ”
Some folk may be incapable of “true intimacy,” but I don’t see how a life of strictly “excited, impersonal sex” can bring real gratification.
As little as I know about Joe and Teresa Giudice, it seems to me this could not have happened to a more deserving couple.
I take some gratification from this news, in that rarely in this life do I really feel I see justice done.
I anticipate having a lot to say about this in the future.